Miksi liturgian ryhtiliikettä tarvitaan?

Yksi videopätkä kertoo enemmän kuin 1000 sanaa korotettuna toiseen potenssiin. Saamme Suomessa olla onnekkaita, ettei meillä ole pappeja, jotka haluavat tuhota kirkkojemme harrasta tunnelmaa typeryyksillä, mauttomuuksilla ja skandaalilta haiskahtavilta pikku pyhäinhäväistyksiltä. Jotta niin ei pääsekään käymään, on parempi tuntea se "toinen todellisuus".

Tässä saksalaista laatua:



Ja tässä vielä klassinen esimerkki ranskalaisen nuorisopyhiinvaelluksen päätösmessusta. Emme me maallikot halua, että papit ovat pellejä vaan pyhiä!

"Mass" at Plobsheim, France, Pentecost 2009 from on Vimeo.

Lopuksi sitaatti pyhältä isältä:

Many people who clearly accepted the binding character of the Second Vatican Council, and were faithful to the Pope and the Bishops, nonetheless also desired to recover the form of the sacred liturgy that was dear to them. This occurred above all because in many places celebrations were not faithful to the prescriptions of the new Missal, but the latter actually was understood as authorizing or even requiring creativity, which frequently led to deformations of the liturgy which were hard to bear. I am speaking from experience, since I too lived through that period with all its hopes and its confusion. And I have seen how arbitrary deformations of the liturgy caused deep pain to individuals totally rooted in the faith of the Church. (Letter of the Holy Father, Pope Benedict XVI to the Bishops of the whole world to present the “Motu Proprio” on the use of the Roman Liturgy prior to the reform of 1970)